- Nov 4, 2013
- 840
- 147
Guest and independent are the same thing FYI. Do my accusations make sense now?
-
Hi and welcome to Minr.org
Who are we?
We are minecrafts 3rd oldest server and the oldest challenge and parkour dedicated server in the world. Our map dates over 7.5 years and our server has had an uptime of 99%. We have over 250 challenges which will keep you occupied for months. All of our challenges have been created by our member base who have completed our hardcore maps. You yourself could one day be creating a challenge for our server if you ever achieve the green membership rank. For more information about zero.minr.org click here...
More information below.
MM XV - Savern Taren-Odern
- Thread starter Srentiln
- Start date
- Status
- Jun 20, 2014
- 348
- 106
If freak was a very decently helpful role after creepa's demise, then we know that this lynching is a big blow. However, cory never provided any evidence, even though he did state he was. This means that maybe we should be wary of those who bandwagoned without thought, or that's what it looked like.
#lynch jagman
We need a move on, and just joining the bandwagon so late is of little help and isn't worth it. Voting so late so that trust can be gained is silly. Also, jag has not been active in the thread which means that he may be involved in more activity outside of it.
#lynch jagman
We need a move on, and just joining the bandwagon so late is of little help and isn't worth it. Voting so late so that trust can be gained is silly. Also, jag has not been active in the thread which means that he may be involved in more activity outside of it.
nahfackler
Peon
- Aug 8, 2014
- 484
- 53
Here is my argument, what evidence do you have against Jagman?
- Jun 20, 2014
- 348
- 106
No hard evidence. A big reason I decided it was fine to lynch him was because he was not providing to the thread, and that the bandwagon vote seemed like some way to make it look like he was one of us.
Pretty much what I said in my post. If we don't move along soon we'll get nowhere.
ALSO if anyone would like some info or stay connected and help eachother out PM me.
Pretty much what I said in my post. If we don't move along soon we'll get nowhere.
ALSO if anyone would like some info or stay connected and help eachother out PM me.
- Thread starter
- #186
- Oct 28, 2013
- 1,934
- 838
As much as I don't want to influence your votes, I feel the need to point out oneo thing:
while I stated that activity this round is important during sign ups, I never said anything about mod-killing for inactivity.
while I stated that activity this round is important during sign ups, I never said anything about mod-killing for inactivity.
- Nov 2, 2013
- 251
- 20
I don't know how I stand with Cory.
No word on @jagman77 though, but to lynch him? Let's see if he responds first
No word on @jagman77 though, but to lynch him? Let's see if he responds first
- Oct 28, 2013
- 509
- 304
Sorry for being so inactive sren, I never have anything to add to the thread...
nahfackler
Peon
- Aug 8, 2014
- 484
- 53
Sleek, why do you want to kill an inactive person, maybe Jagman is just observing in the shadows, I still don't think that killing Jagman will get us anywhere.
- Oct 27, 2013
- 344
- 129
Trying to defend myself would not be easy right now, however I have revealed my role to cory, and Im sure that he can back me up when I say getting rid of me could be a big loss to the innocents.
I also know that sleek wasnt cory's only source of information about freak, I also mentioned my suspicions to him.
Not sure if votes for nobody outweighs votes for someone, but
#vote nobody
#AllHandsBraceForImpact
I also know that sleek wasnt cory's only source of information about freak, I also mentioned my suspicions to him.
Not sure if votes for nobody outweighs votes for someone, but
#vote nobody
#AllHandsBraceForImpact
- Oct 26, 2013
- 546
- 315
#vote nobody
Inactivity doesn't mean he's a pirate.
Inactivity doesn't mean he's a pirate.
- Nov 4, 2013
- 840
- 147
I don't think the bandwagon vote really means anything. I would've done the same thing if I had been active while someone was claiming to have hard proof against another player. And the inactivity thing... what has there been to say for most of the round? Jag isn't the only one.
EDIT: And I don't like how Cory made a post but ignored my last question. I was starting to assume he thought "innocent" and "guest" were included in the same faction and I'd misunderstood the lynch against freak, but now I don't know what to think...
Last edited:
- Nov 6, 2013
- 53
- 24
I agree with the points above, I have been pretty inactive as well but that doesn't mean I'm a pirate. Until someone has evidence or we can work out the cory situation,
#vote nobody
#vote nobody
- Oct 26, 2013
- 546
- 315
Electro, I honestly do not understand what you're asking me. I'm assessing the current situation and would rather save an innocent than waste my time trying to figure out your question
nahfackler
Peon
- Aug 8, 2014
- 484
- 53
I agree with all of the previous votes and I think Jagman is a huge asset, so unless I have solid evidence,
#votenobody
Sleek, I have no idea where you thought that killing inactive people was a good idea
#votenobody
Sleek, I have no idea where you thought that killing inactive people was a good idea
- Jan 4, 2014
- 216
- 160
Eh I don't agree with scumkilling, especially considering Jag is usually a valuable asset to the innocents regardless of whether he's a power role or not. There's better people to be voting off right now with the reasoning of 'no contribution'.
#Vote Nobody
#Vote Nobody
- Nov 2, 2013
- 512
- 160
#vote nobody
no hard evidence, no vote. Voting off of guesses has a large likelihood of hurting the crew more then the pirates at this point in the game.
no hard evidence, no vote. Voting off of guesses has a large likelihood of hurting the crew more then the pirates at this point in the game.
- Jun 20, 2014
- 348
- 106
Well I felt that something had to happen if nothing was happening.
#vote no one
If cory trusts him I can trust him.
#vote no one
If cory trusts him I can trust him.
- Nov 4, 2013
- 840
- 147
It really isn't complicated. You said he wasn't an innocent, which is understandable, but then you extended to saying he wasn't a guest/independent either, giving us no real evidence to support your claim. Then, when he died, you contradicted yourself by saying "but he WAS an independent." Do you get it now?
- Oct 26, 2013
- 546
- 315
Ah I see, I thought that a guest was just a powerless innocent, that's where I was mistaken I suppose. I knew he was an independent but I guess my wording was bad.
- Status