- Nov 4, 2013
- 840
- 147
I don't know what you're trying to convey here
-
Hi and welcome to Minr.org
Who are we?
We are minecrafts 3rd oldest server and the oldest challenge and parkour dedicated server in the world. Our map dates over 7.5 years and our server has had an uptime of 99%. We have over 250 challenges which will keep you occupied for months. All of our challenges have been created by our member base who have completed our hardcore maps. You yourself could one day be creating a challenge for our server if you ever achieve the green membership rank. For more information about zero.minr.org click here...
More information below.
Minr Mafia XIX: Retribution
- Thread starter CreepaShadowz
- Start date
-
- Tags
- mafia
- Status
- Nov 4, 2013
- 840
- 147
Why bring it up as suspicious if you don't have a real opinion on it?I don't know if I find it suspicious, but I have nothing else to work with
I'm mostly curious because it was just such a strange thing to call someone out for either way, and without any reason or context for why it caught your eye. Questioning people is a green light in most cases if anything.
As for Z3 being fillery, I don't think that means a lot at this stage. If he keeps posting like this as the game develops and there's substantial content to look at, I'd start looking into him.
- Thread starter
- #43
- Apr 21, 2014
- 1,056
- 453
I copied most of the Commandments that I considered relevant to the game under Standard Rules (skipped 1, 7 and 9).
9 was a sort of mixed bag for me as it means to avoid using meta at all, which would be your past experience with players (which you can't avoid using to some degree) but also implied the "no-grudges" idea.
However, I hope that no-grudges is sufficiently covered by the Play in the spirit of the game and Play to win rules. If it isn't, killing over grudges is not allowed. You can use past experience though. Again, play within the spirit of the game.
9 was a sort of mixed bag for me as it means to avoid using meta at all, which would be your past experience with players (which you can't avoid using to some degree) but also implied the "no-grudges" idea.
However, I hope that no-grudges is sufficiently covered by the Play in the spirit of the game and Play to win rules. If it isn't, killing over grudges is not allowed. You can use past experience though. Again, play within the spirit of the game.
- Feb 18, 2014
- 126
- 71
I agree with this, its day one and there isn't any substantial evidence for anyone at this point which is part of what makes this random lynch mechanic so interesting.
- Nov 4, 2013
- 840
- 147
Any opinion on my interactions with Edan/bstrey?
- Feb 18, 2014
- 126
- 71
You started the game very aggresively especially questioning bstrey immediately when all she did was ask a question that she didnt know the answer to, this makes you seem very suspicious in my eyes and the eyes of most people here. Your interactions with Edan were definetly much more brief and just ended up with each of you becoming suspicous.
Whilst there isn't any substantial evidence there definetly is alot of questionable behaviour surrounding you.
Maybe the sense of how things go in mafia has changed since the last time I played, but in the past, I might've been a slight bit suspicious to see one form an opinion about someone based on a simple question.
- Feb 28, 2015
- 370
- 147
Seems pretty fast to be calling people out. I think electro was just trying to get the game moving, unless he's had plenty of experience at this.
Plus the fact that someone has to be lynched in less than 48 hours, have to get something out.
Plus the fact that someone has to be lynched in less than 48 hours, have to get something out.
Last edited:
The problem is that someone needs to be lynched, no matter by random chance or voting. I feel like it'd be way better to lynch someone ourselves than leaving it up to luck.
So far SleeknFoxy, creeperTNTman198, and nahfackler haven't replied to the thread at all. As long as they respond I'll be fine with them but if not I say we lynch one. Even if they prove to be an innocent, if they haven't been involved in beginning chat it'd be hard to rely on them in endgame.
As for the likeliest mafia, innocent, and independent counts from what I can gather:
16 Players currently exist
3-4 Mafia?
2-3 Independents
10 Innocents
So far SleeknFoxy, creeperTNTman198, and nahfackler haven't replied to the thread at all. As long as they respond I'll be fine with them but if not I say we lynch one. Even if they prove to be an innocent, if they haven't been involved in beginning chat it'd be hard to rely on them in endgame.
As for the likeliest mafia, innocent, and independent counts from what I can gather:
16 Players currently exist
3-4 Mafia?
2-3 Independents
10 Innocents
- Nov 4, 2013
- 840
- 147
1) Why is aggressiveness suspicious? It's starting to get us somewhere, isn't it?
2) Uh no, I gave her innocent points for that and (I think) explained pretty clearly why I did it.
3) Reason for each of us?
@bstrey It's not a very strong or reliable indicator, but it was enough to make note of when I reviewed the first page for something to start discussion about. A weak signal is still a signal.
- Nov 4, 2013
- 840
- 147
So much this. And I think what a lot of people don't realize in mafia is that being really cautious and having an innocent-until-proven-guilty mindset isn't going to help catch scum the vast majority of the time. There's a fine line between reason and inaction.
Creepa did say that there were probably 3 mafia in the opening post. There's really no way of knowing how reliable that claim is, but I'd say it's probably true and put my estimate for the alignment count at 11/3/2. I'm not sure that Creep would put 3 or more independents in a medium-sized setup like this.
I'm kind of skeptical of how Luma joined the suspicion on me but didn't speak up until I questioned him about it, so I'd probably vote there before one of the inactives. I need to see how he responds to my last post before committing to a read on him, though.
- Apr 30, 2017
- 63
- 14
I agree with rm about the inactive players. I'll give them 24 hours to post, and if they don't say anything, we lynch one of them.
- Jun 19, 2017
- 63
- 7
Give me time to read, I'm on a phone right now.
Some people are drunk.
Some people are drunk.
- Jun 19, 2017
- 63
- 7
Electro didnt even question bstrey AT ALL, and even if he did this makes NO SENSE as a case for why hes scum. Asking stuff doesnt make you scum.
I would like more elaboration unles i missed something.
You said theres no substansiall evidence yet you said hes "very suspicious". I don't understand.
Edit: I made this response before finishing reading up, so some of these points has already been made.
- Jun 19, 2017
- 63
- 7
Apologies for awful grammar, I'm on a phone.
- Jun 19, 2017
- 63
- 7
I uave to go for now, #VOTE Pro Luma
- Jun 20, 2014
- 348
- 106
"Is there a mod-convened chat area for innocents?" /s
Also I think independents win if they are alive and one of the sides wins maybe I could be wrong though.
Also I am as innocent as innocent can be so if y'all wanna inbox me hmu, maybe make a group inbox idk
Also to add, bstrey looking pretty suspicious with the accusations of electro and then voting off a random afk
I will withhold my vote for now
Oh, and should we include @CreepaShadowz in a group chat so that nothing fishy goes on?
Also I think independents win if they are alive and one of the sides wins maybe I could be wrong though.
Also I am as innocent as innocent can be so if y'all wanna inbox me hmu, maybe make a group inbox idk
Also to add, bstrey looking pretty suspicious with the accusations of electro and then voting off a random afk
I will withhold my vote for now
Oh, and should we include @CreepaShadowz in a group chat so that nothing fishy goes on?
- Apr 13, 2017
- 180
- 139
I agree that players that don't do anything should be voted for but we should wait until tomorrow to do it because there is still time for them to do stuff
- Jun 20, 2014
- 348
- 106
I agree. Wait til tomorrow, let people who have not yet replied get a chance to reply before voting because I just replied and I am thankful no one had voted for me
- Status