Kind of a thinking puzzle

Srentiln

minr op since Nov 2011
Op
Oct 28, 2013
1,934
838
I was thinking of a story out of (I think) UC Berkley a professor told my class and thought I'd see how people here would do with the same situation.

You are shown an acorn and then a log from an oak tree. "Where did the mass come from?"

Keep in mind that this happened to three Biology PhD candidates and they all got it wrong.
 

Freakworld

The best user.
Greenie
Oct 27, 2013
1,024
378
You are shown an acorn and then a log from an oak tree. "Where did the mass come from?"
That's an anagram hold your horses.

YOU ARE SHOWN AN ACORN AND THEN A LOG FROM AN OAK TREE WHERE DID THE MASS COME FROM

H L TREE D E M COM FR

HL TREE COMFRMED

>HL THREE CONFIRMED

HALF LIFE 3 CONFIRMED

"Where did the mass come from?"
Since this is an obvious half life reference, it did not get any mass because it's radioactive, it loses mass.

So it was either a very heavy acorn or a very small oak tree.

And since both are made out of plants, which I assume are made out of the same atoms, my point stands.

Also note this:

Proves my point even further.
 

Srentiln

minr op since Nov 2011
Op
Oct 28, 2013
1,934
838
it's an actual scientific answer, freak's response is null and void for one reason:

Vechs is in the early-alpha test group for half life 3
 

creeperTNTman198

Lord of the Creepers
Greenie
Nov 2, 2013
512
160
Plants take in atoms and create structures out of them using sunlight (photons) as energy. These structures are used to build more cells, which allows the plants to grow and gain mass. So, the mass basically comes from dead matter whose atoms have been reconstituted into the plant. Though, if we are going super far, the mass comes from atoms that were produced in the heart of stars.

This is my answer
 

Srentiln

minr op since Nov 2011
Op
Oct 28, 2013
1,934
838
no, and while the answer is science-based, it's very simple.
 

TheForgottenUser

Honorary green
Whitey
Nov 3, 2013
584
232
Nowhere. Your statement contains nothing about growth.

EDIT: And if this isn't a trick question then my answer is carbon that got fixed from the atmosphere. I feel like that's what TNTman meant though.
 
Last edited:

Srentiln

minr op since Nov 2011
Op
Oct 28, 2013
1,934
838
While worded a bit oddly, I think forgot got it correct:
carbon that got fixed from the atmosphere
more simply known as "the air"

btw, the biology PhD candidates (who *should* have known more about this than me) all said, "the soil"
 

Freakworld

The best user.
Greenie
Oct 27, 2013
1,024
378
since the loss of mass is reverse mass growth aka int mass = mass.growth()-- i still consider my answer correct
 

DistinctMadness

Mafia Overseer 2.0
Greenie
Nov 2, 2013
664
242
I"ll be honest, I think creeperTNT was pretty much right. A+ to creeperTNT
Also how the f**k did bio majors not know that one? I knew that one and I'm in high school bio, that's not a very advanced course
 

Srentiln

minr op since Nov 2011
Op
Oct 28, 2013
1,934
838
Dis, creeper's rather technically laiden answer pointed to a more siplistc version of "the soil" since
dead matter whose atoms have been reconstituted into the plant
has that implication.

However, the first part of his post was a fairly accurate statement of what plants do.
 
Top