- Oct 26, 2013
- 546
- 315
I'm sure we have a few days to decide what to do, let's wait and see what happens, otherwise we could lose a player that is essential to us.
-
Hi and welcome to Minr.org
Who are we?
We are minecrafts 3rd oldest server and the oldest challenge and parkour dedicated server in the world. Our map dates over 7.5 years and our server has had an uptime of 99%. We have over 250 challenges which will keep you occupied for months. All of our challenges have been created by our member base who have completed our hardcore maps. You yourself could one day be creating a challenge for our server if you ever achieve the green membership rank. For more information about zero.minr.org click here...
More information below.
Minr Mafia 10 Chinatown
- Thread starter henniboy321
- Start date
- Status
- Oct 28, 2013
- 1,934
- 838
*drags himself in covered in welts* Imma go mining!
*grabs a pick and walks out*
*grabs a pick and walks out*
- Nov 4, 2013
- 840
- 147
Also, we can't actually vote anyone off yet. Like henna said, we're all safe until the next day/night cycle.
- Thread starter
- #44
- Nov 2, 2013
- 437
- 239
Sorry for the poor explaining but you can vote for someone right now. You can vote someone who can talk outside this thread. That means that there will be one person who can talk outside this thread. The other have to either communicate through here or talk that person.
- Oct 28, 2013
- 1,934
- 838
I'm a bit confused by that...are you saying we must elect a single person who tell you what everyone is doing?
- Thread starter
- #46
- Nov 2, 2013
- 437
- 239
no I'll try to explain again. I know it is a bit confusing but the general rule is that no one can talk with each other outside this thread. But there is one person who CAN talk outside this thread. Now it is up to you to vote who that one person will be. Does that make a bit of sense?
- Oct 27, 2013
- 1,024
- 378
- Nov 18, 2013
- 1,926
- 1,032
Alright, so like a game before, we weren't allowed to talk outside of the thread, if you got caught, you're dead. Now this day, we're able to choose ONE person that is allowed to talk outside of the thread, which means that (s)he can scavenge information without everyone knowing, BUT everyone knows that (s)he can talk, so his/her information is likely to be scavenged, but that aspect can also be used to fool, if (s)he is mafia. We can all talk freely with that one person out of the thread, but I assume the talk has to start from the 'chosen one'.
If you manage to get a bond with that person, you are also likely to get his/her information more easily, which allows you to do your 'research'. This person will be key to the gameflow.
Lets say, we have no clue if we're going to choose a mafia. If we do, we are in serious trouble.
It's best to choose someone that actually does something with this ability.
If you manage to get a bond with that person, you are also likely to get his/her information more easily, which allows you to do your 'research'. This person will be key to the gameflow.
Lets say, we have no clue if we're going to choose a mafia. If we do, we are in serious trouble.
It's best to choose someone that actually does something with this ability.
- Thread starter
- #49
- Nov 2, 2013
- 437
- 239
what ricky said but s(he) does not have to start the conversation
- Nov 5, 2013
- 1,824
- 1,051
Alright, now I understand.
So we're supposed to pick someone who can generally boost the innocent team's chances if (s)he is innocent, but also someone who won't give mafia too much of a lead if (s)he is mafia.
I nominate (not voting, just suggesting) two of the obvious choices:
srentiln - Always strong in the game, although may screw us all over if mafia
Forgot - The same as sren.
Like I said, I am not voting for any of these two, I'm just saying that they can be good candidates.
Thoughts?
So we're supposed to pick someone who can generally boost the innocent team's chances if (s)he is innocent, but also someone who won't give mafia too much of a lead if (s)he is mafia.
I nominate (not voting, just suggesting) two of the obvious choices:
srentiln - Always strong in the game, although may screw us all over if mafia
Forgot - The same as sren.
Like I said, I am not voting for any of these two, I'm just saying that they can be good candidates.
Thoughts?
- Oct 27, 2013
- 1,024
- 378
Oh okay so the voted person is allowed to converse via pm/anything else
and only for that phase, right? or forever?
and only for that phase, right? or forever?
- Nov 18, 2013
- 1,926
- 1,032
Forever, when he dies a new one will be chosen iirc from the main post.
I hope.
I hope.
- Nov 2, 2013
- 664
- 242
even though sren is pretty logical and is a good player, i don;t think he'd be good for this role.
As far as i can tell, sren hardly talks about this game outside the thread, which would kinda defeat the purpose of being able to talk outside the thread. Forgot on the other hand i know from personal experience, talks a lot outside the thread. I'll leave it at that but i can go into my detail if needed
As far as i can tell, sren hardly talks about this game outside the thread, which would kinda defeat the purpose of being able to talk outside the thread. Forgot on the other hand i know from personal experience, talks a lot outside the thread. I'll leave it at that but i can go into my detail if needed
- Thread starter
- #54
- Nov 2, 2013
- 437
- 239
Sorry I forgot to mention. The one who got voted will chose the next player
- Oct 27, 2013
- 1,024
- 378
- Oct 28, 2013
- 1,934
- 838
Okay, so here's my suggestion for this part:
if we told JUST the sheriff nominate the deputy (since the sheriff knows the deputy), then we'd potentially learn mafia members because if they tried to impersonate the sheriff, the real one would know them right away. We also would know 100% that the talker is safe for us.
However, this would also tell the mafia who two of our power roles are, and therefore is a super high-risk strategy.
Additionally, though, the deputy would most likely be safe for a few rounds because he is the only way to gain information about the other three power roles and the guard could potentially save him from attack.
if we told JUST the sheriff nominate the deputy (since the sheriff knows the deputy), then we'd potentially learn mafia members because if they tried to impersonate the sheriff, the real one would know them right away. We also would know 100% that the talker is safe for us.
However, this would also tell the mafia who two of our power roles are, and therefore is a super high-risk strategy.
Additionally, though, the deputy would most likely be safe for a few rounds because he is the only way to gain information about the other three power roles and the guard could potentially save him from attack.
- Nov 2, 2013
- 512
- 160
Just a warning going with sren's idea, a mafia member could pretend to be the sheriff and call out the real sheriff as a "fake" and manipulate us into killing the real sheriff
- Nov 4, 2013
- 840
- 147
True, but once the sheriff died, it would then be obvious that the counterclaimer lied and he/she would be exposed. As a whole, though, I'm still against revealing two of our power roles as part of the plan, especially since the scenario I just described probably wouldn't happen. It would be pretty careless for a mafia player to put him/herself in a situation like that unless the team was in immediate danger from the sheriff.
- Oct 28, 2013
- 1,934
- 838
suggestion was probably the wrong term, but oh well. My main point was that we had a strong way to guarantee the voice was innocent, but it did have a very high cost/risk.
I would push for someone other than me be elected for one simple reason: I have never been strong at information gathering.
I would push for someone other than me be elected for one simple reason: I have never been strong at information gathering.
- Oct 27, 2013
- 1,024
- 378
- Status